Roman Calendar

Random Greco-Roman Image

Sunday, September 4, 2011

RE: THREE FAMINES by T. Keneally STARVED FOR EVIDENCE INDEED


Blaming Britain (and in the subtext "capitalism") for the Irish Potato Famine and claiming it was a "holocaust" as bad as anything the Nazis did is old hat for extreme Irish nationalists. They almost always fail to note that there was a Potato Famine in the Scottish Highlands at the same time which led to hundreds of thousands moving to lowland cities or emigrating. They also fail to notice that many Britons contributed to famine relief funds, a fact pointed out by Andrew Roberts. Queen Victoria was not aloof from these trials as can be seen by her personal letters and the personal interest she showed in alleviating the suffering of famine victims contributing large sums for charity and famine relief. The famine was very real. As as a descendant of Irish and Scottish Gaels a strong memory of the Great Hunger (An T-Acras Mor) was part of our heritage. We often debated the causes and the policies of the governments at that time but the main conclusion was that it was absolutely fatal for any society to be based so heavily on a monoculture such as became the case in rural Ireland and in the Scottish Highlands.




Thomas Keneally is of course a novelist looking for sensational stories and I think one last chance to knock Britain the Commonwealth which he despises. But Keneally goes beyond any of the "Famine was deliberate school" to link Britain to other great famines such as the Bengal Famine of 1943-1944 and the Ethiopian famines of the 1970's and 1980's.



But Andrew Roberts is right these were not the greatest food shortages in modern history.



There is no doubt that Stalin's collectivization induced famines were among worse and largest and most unnecessary famines in all history. The Kulaks were efficient and productive farmers; they were killed for reasons of ideology and revenge and Stalin's paranoia more than anything else.



Greater in scope and numbers of victims has to be Mao's Chinese famines in the 1960's. In the Great Leap Forward the hills were denuded of trees to smelt iron and entire populations of birds were eradicated on orders of the Communist Party. This led to huge infestations of insects which devastated crops.



We all know of the hunger and famine in Nazi occupied Europe, particularly Russia but even Hitler's "Great Hunger" was brief compared to Stalin's and Mao's.



And in the case of the great totalitarian dictators famine was used as weapon and it was government policy to confiscate food and to deny food aid to victims. It was never British policy in 1943-1944 to confiscate food from civilians or to deny them any food aid in Bengal. As Andrew Roberts points out the Allies were in a desperate life and death struggle with Axis forces in Burma. Yes, they could have chosen not to supply Allied Troops and allowed the Japanese Militarists to conquer Bengal. But can anyone believe -can anyone actually believe!!!- that the Japanese policy towards starving civilians would have been benevolent? Their record in China, on the Death Railway, Allied POW's and in their occupied countries makes such a notion impossible for any fair and rational observer to even consider that anything Britain and her allies did could compare to the vastness of Axis war crimes.



It was never British policy to confiscate food from civilians and denying them food aid in Ireland during the famine years 1845-1851. And it is a great stretch to include Ethiopia in this mix because Britain was no longer a major player in that region of Africa nor a dominant world power.



Keneally's greatest calumny of all is not against Britain or her Commonwealth but against Prime Minister Winston Churchill. To this man and to his leadership we in the West owe our very freedom. It was he, not Stalin, who defied Hitler and made it possible for the Allies to hold on until the full strength of the United States could be brought to bear. To even consider placing Churchill on the same level of murderous terror and ruthlessness as Hitler, Stalin or Mao is contemptible and of course places into doubt Mr. Keneally's objectivity and accuracy as an author.



To write such lies and calumnies is to be on the level of a far-left or far-right propagandist with no respect for the facts and no attempt at finding the truth.



"Starved for evidence" is right. Thomas Keneally may be right that we must investigate famines and unavoidable human tragedies and learn from them. No rational person could be joyous at the suffering and starvation of millions. But there is a vast difference between catastrophes that are a direct and deliberate policy of a government and policy and catastrophes that are acts of God that no one could have predicted and that no one really wanted.



By the way, my wife and I have belonged to Children International for over 25 years and are sponsoring and have sponsored children in the Bengal region of India. We are not indifferent to the suffering of others in our own land and in distant lands. We know it is not enough to share the crumbs from the feast. We make a real sacrifice to make sure our monthly contributions are paid and we also make voluntary donations for Easter, Christmas, our sponsored child's birthday and also special needs requests. We know our sponsored children by name and correspond with them. We can never forget the hungry, the thirsty and the orphans of empire. But we do not dwell on thoughts of blame, hatred and revenge. Instead we live a life of service and dedicate a portion of our modest income to charity.

We can question to what extent governments are responsible for famine relief, farm policy and foreign aid. But to me the historical lesson is clear: the greatest man-made famines in the world have been induced by Totalitarian governments of the Far Right and the Far Left not by corporations like Nestle, American presidents or British Prime Ministers. The real question we should ask ourselves is why certain economic systems are unable to feed their own people and how authoritarian governments actively use food coupons and famine as a weapon of revenge. That is a famine story I would like to hear more about.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Self-Reliance and Individualism have their limits.

The brave man is not afraid to serve, voluntarily a greater cause than he for the common good. Note I said voluntarily.  I recognize my debt to others and the civil society in which I live.  God made us strong only for a while so that we can help others.  One cannot only think of one's self but i also believe in the virtue of self-reliance because I know that in self-reliance is great strength, joy and dignity.  But I am also wise enough to know that one man alone is not enough; united we stand -as free men with a free choice-divided we fall.   The virtue of self-reliance and individualism if taken the extreme is a flawed ideal that constricts our social, national and our personal emotional natures.  No man is an island; we live and flourish in communities.  It is in the context of a civil society and its social structures that great things can be done and achieved never forgetting the right to individual freedom, individual conscience to worship God (or not) as one wishes in one's private life.   I believe very strongly in the private life, my private religion and my private languages but i am also a citizen.  I have individual rights but I also have duties to perform for my school, my community, my state, my nation and my house of God.   If you do not know such virtues or such community spirit then I pity you.  You are missing out on the chance to help others and be helped by them and to gain the love and gratitude of your neighbors and your fellows.   RICHARD K. MUNRO

Caledonia




A Munro sleeping on a rock
Auld Lang Syne: The Leal and True Men arrive:
France August 1914 THEY SHALL NOT PASS!!!
Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders


ARTICLE ONE OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

An Eternal Bond:WWI Jocks and Doughboys










Dear Sir:








I want to thank you for your thoughtful and moving tribute to the Doughboys. Indeed “Pershing’s army has finally retired from the field. The drum is stilled….”







I am descended from World War II and World War I veterans and I have an especial love and respect for the Doughboys.







My father and uncles served in the American forces during WWII but my Scottish grandfather served in a Highland Regiment –the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders- from August 1914 until May 1919. His name was Thomas Munro, Sr. (1886-1963) and he received the Military Medal for Valour during 2nd Ypres (1915). He was one of only three men in his company to serve the entire war without being killed or seriously wounded.







One of the happiest days of his life was when they got the news that the United States had declared war on Germany in April 1917. He was stationed at Salonika at the time and all the talk was that the Balkans could be abandoned to prepare for a last ditch defense against the Germans on the Western Front. My grandfather survived 2nd Ypres –barely, and Gallipoli and the Struma Valley but he probably would not have survived 5th Ypres. He knew then the Allies would win the war and so he had this photo taken and sent to my grandmother with the note; “Dear Mary, running to catch the post. With America in the war victory cannot be far off. Your loving husband, Thomas.” He always felt he literally owed his life to the Doughboys.











He and his Scottish pals volunteered en masse in response to the declaration of war following the violation of Belgium’s neutrality by Germany. They were encouraged by Scottish Chiefs and their sons and nephews and notable Scots like Arthur Conan Doyle whose brother-in-law, nephews and brothers all enlisted (they would all be killed or die of their wounds).. One of the most famous people to enlist in the Argylls and to encourage others to do likewise was Harry Lauder’s son Captain John Lauder who was later killed in action after having been seriously wounded twice. Later Harry Lauder wrote “Keep Right On To the End of the Road” in honor of his son, the Argylls and all the Allied soldiers who experienced the Calvary of the Western Front.










Over 200,000 men enlisted in Glasgow –a number that seems incredible today- but not all of the men were Glaswegians or even Scottish. I would estimate that at least 50,000 were overseas Scots or people of Scottish sympathies of blood. We should remember many Americans as well as Canadians were in the war from the very beginning. My grandfather grew up playing shinty in the Highlands (he never played football or soccer) but during the war he played baseball in Salonika in 1917 with the Americans and Canadians in the Allied Forces there. So there were Canadians and Americans in the Argylls as well as Italians, Irish, English, Scandinavians, Jews, Catholics and Protestants.







My grandfather’s best friend was called American Johnny Robertson by everyone because he was a naturalized US citizen. Robertson just happened to be in Glasgow at the time of the declaration of war and so got caught up in all his enthusiasm. Robertson, whose photograph can be seen in the Edison museum with Thomas Edison, was an electronics and communications expert. He was a master of improvisation and of keeping phone communications between the front and the rear. I never knew him of course he died in 1941- but my father and grandfather knew him very well and my father saw the letter of recommendation signed by Thomas Edison that “American” Johnny always carried with him. I own books that belonged to Johnny Robertson –called “Uncle Johnny” by my father which Robertson had given to my father in 1938 before he returned to Scotland after a second long sojourn in America that began in 1920. He and my grandfather were roommates and travelled all over America working on various construction projects in New York, Baltimore, Galveston , Texas and other places.







http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40815F93F5C1B728DDDAB0894D9405B878DF1D3











Today we sometimes think World War I was all for nothing and the men who enlisted were naïve but to those men they were defending the lifeline of their country for if Belgium and the channel ports had fallen to the Germans and their U-Boats the British Isles would have been in a precarious position as we were later to see during WWII. They knew Kaiserism was a real danger to the peace, freedom and independence of the English-speaking peoples as well as others.






Hence the dogged determination by the British and Commonwealth forces to hold on to Ypres. Over 250,000 British and Commonwealth soldiers would give their lives in the desperate defense of the Ypres Salient. My grandfather and his Scottish pals helped hold the Ypres Salient at 2nd Ypres; they arrived at the Western Front in January 1915 and the fighting started to heat up gradually in March 1915 until it exploded in a terrific battle of hellish proportions that saw the first wide-scale use of poison gas by the Germans. Some of the fiercest fighting took place from April 1915 and early May specifically from May 8 to May 13th. The Argylls spent 36 straight days in combat without any relief and much of the time individual companies were cut off and virtually surrounded without any officers or NCO’s.






Privates like Colin Campbell Mitchell, Sr., took command and organized strong points, rationing food and water and resupplying themselves at night from the bodies of dead soldiers. He was later given a battlefield commission in the Argylls to captain. The Argylls had very few machine guns but the men had four or five rifles a piece –usually the Smelly, the Lee-Enfield Mark III with the spitzer .303 high velocity ammunition. They were lucky to be armed in abundance with the best bolt action infantry rifle ever produced. A reasonably trained soldier could easily get off 15 rounds a minute but in the top British regiments most of the soldiers were trained to shoot over 20 rounds a minute even reaching 30 rounds in a crisis situation. As guns and ammunition were plentiful this gave the British and Commonwealth troops a decisive advantage especially in defense where the Germans could not utilize their heavy machine guns. There were many stories of squads holding a flank using multiple rifles against hundreds of attackers.







None of the allied troops had any gas masks to begin with and their only defense was blankets, rubberized tents and urine impregnated handkerchiefs. One of the reasons the Argyll positions were not lost is that medical students from Glasgow University were quick to indentify the gas as chlorine gas and rapidly improvised a defense. The urine impregnated handkerchiefs acted as a primitive filter and gave soldiers a few minutes of extra protection. In the first days their only tactic was to take cover in shelters that were as air tight as possible and hope that the winds or rain would blow away the gas. Individual soldiers would venture out protected only by motorcycle goggles and medical gauze impregnated with urine. Later they got supplies of chemicals to do the same thing and supplemented with captured German gas masks. The leader of the Argylls during the most desperate days was Captain Dick Donald Porteous (called “Port” by the men); he was killed in the very last stage of the battle by a German sniper on May 10, 1915. My grandfather said Captain Porteous was a great and beloved man and that he could have been as great as Churchill. So many talented and good men were lost in that terrible war.







Today 2nd Ypres is largely forgotten but the heroism and resourcefulness of the soldiers of the 81st Brigade and the 27th Division which included Indian troops (“Dins”) , the Black Watch, the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders and the Highland Light Infantry matched anything in the annals of human warfare including Balaklava which was the signature Thin Red Line moment of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders.







But all that sacrifice would have been for naught if had not been for the Doughboys like Frank Buckles, Joyce Kilmer (killed in action), Col. “Wild Bill” Donovan, (Medal of Honor), Marine Sergeant Major Dan Daly (Twice awarded the Medal of Honor).,Alvin York (Medal of Honor), Eddie Rickenbacker, Quentin Roosevelt (killed in action and now buried next to his brother another Doughboy Gen Theodore Roosevelt Jr who died after D-day –also awarded the Medal of Honor.) and Major Whittlesey of the Lost Battalion (Medal of Honor). Behind them was a force of Doughboys almost 2,000,000 strong. The fact that only about half of them reached Europe is beside the point. Their mere existence and their readiness to cross the Atlantic to go Over There completely demoralized the Germans and at the same time gave the Allies the courage they needed to hang on just a little longer until relief finally came.







Britain, the Democracies of Europe and the world owe a very great debt of gratitude to the American fighting men of the twentieth century. We should remember their fortitude and their selfless devotion to duty in the cause of liberty.







It is not an exaggeration to say the whole of Western Europe and the Free World is their monument. NE OBLIVISCARIS: do not forget. And to the Doughboys I give personal thanks and pledge to honor their memory the rest of my life. I had only one grandfather growing up (the other was killed in August 1918) but I was blessed to have at least one and get to know him, love him and hear his stories. Many other sons and grandsons were not so lucky.











Richard K. Munro





 



Why do people riot, loot and steal?


Why do people riot, loot and steal?


.by Richard K. Munro on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 at 7:08pm.Richard K. Munro



Urban "Youths" at play
Sorry to say but this doesn't look like New York's Finest; they seem demoralized and underequipped.

People who have three square meals a day, free education, free healthcare, cheap public transportation, free or subsidized housing do not riot like san cullottes due to a lack of material necessities. They steal because they are greedy and amoral and have TOO MUCH free time on their hands. Idleness is the devil's workshop is an old saying. How true. They are uncontrolled because they are a spoiled entitlement mob expecting more bread, more booze, more holidays and more circuses (entertainment). Hard working decent people of honor would be ashamed to act as they do (I am sure still most British people are horrified and ashamed at the behavior of this state-subsidized underclass).

Monday, August 8, 2011

Reading is a very special and inestimable pleasure

Two well-known Shakespearean actors: Maurice Evans & Charlton Heston
"Human see, human do."


George Taylor (Charlton Heston): "Take your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape." quoted in the current blockbuster.
 
Most famous quote by a Shakespearan actor in the 20th century (Maurice Evans as Dr. Zaius)

Maurice Evans had fun in Hollywooed for laughs and lucre
 
"Dr. Zira, I must caution you. Experimental brain surgery on these creatures is one thing, and I'm all in favor of it. But your behavior studies are another matter. To suggest that we can learn anything about the simian nature from a study of man is sheer nonsense. Why, man is a nuisance. He eats up his food supply in the forest, then migrates to our green belts and ravages our crops. The sooner he is exterminated, the better. It's a question of simian survival."
 
Also "The Forbidden Zone was once a paradise. Your breed made a desert of it, ages ago."




Reading for pleasure is a vital part of reading development. In order to read well one must have an adequate vocabulary and the discipline to concentrate. One does not develop vocabulary by watching TV sit-coms. One does not develop vocabulary having casual conversations. One develops vocabulary and cultural literacy by a steady habit of reading and when one is young, in particular, by being read to. I enjoy recorded books occasionally as a change of pace but for me they could not replace books because, frankly, there are not many quality recorded books and certainly the range is very small. Book reading seems today almost as much a minority pleasure as in Fahrenheit 451. Yet, in the end, reading and writing are both inestimable pleasures. One is foolish not to give reading a try.


Of course, some of the reading we do will not be for pleasure. Reading tax information or reading an application for a passport. However, I believe reading is a habit and the pleasures of reading are developed by choice and whim. If you enjoy reading adventure or about hunting and fishing or sports or military history great. As a boy I was an avid reader of sports biographies and comic books. Then I graduated to science fiction. I read the entire collections of autors I liked. And of course science fiction led me to read H.G. Wells, Ray Bradbury, Steven Vincent Benet, Jules Verne, and Joseph Conrad.



You don't have to be a specialist. You can develop an amateur interest in the subject and as you become an aficionado you will enjoy it even more. I also believe there is a place for reading aloud. Some prose and some poetry is best when read aloud. Recently I was hiking round the South Rim of the Grand Canyon. As it is my habit I also carry some small books with me to read in a spare moment. I have not yet graduated to Kindle or Nook. I enjoy having a physical book which I can carry with me and where I can underline the words. I enjoy reading the WSJ on line when I am on vacation or in a remote location. There it is a delight to have access in a place where there are no kiosks. Nevertheless, I prefer reading the newspaper and when I like articles I can keep them. They are already printed out. One thing people do not mention is that the permant book like the permanent magazine article or the printed encourage re-reading. Re-reading fine literature is one of the great pleasures of reading. On-line articles have the great virtue of being easy to share and interactive, which is wonderful in its own way. But I rarely re-read or closely read on-line articles. If I like a book review I print it out to keep for future reference.



The 20th century scholar, author and teacher Gilbert Highet gave good advice on reading: Highet recommends to readers to read for pleasure and mature their reading pleasures. Highet believed it was important to choose an “important author” and read all of his or her work. He argues that such a regimen helps readers to “escape from themselves.” It certainly will develop taste and stamina for reading. Highet felt “it is also valuable to push directly through the works of a good author, trying to see them as a single creation, appreciating their wholeness and their uniqueness and leaving the details for later study.”



I have followed his advice with a few authors, Conrad, Hemingway, Orwell, Twain, Camilo José Cela, Emile Zola, Cervantes, and a lot but not quite all of Chesterton, or Dickens or Shakespeare. Of course, I have followed Highet’s advice with his own work. Many of his books remain in print; The Classical Tradition, The Art of Teaching, Man’s Unconquerable Mind are enduring books. I consider Highet’s best essays on par with anything Orwell or Chesterton wrote. Most of his books and essays are still are in print. A great anthology could be compiled just publishing his numerous book reviews. I have read dozens of them from the 1950’s and 1960’s.



In addition, Highet, suggests reading about “one single important and interesting subject: for instance, the paintings of the cave men; or the agony of modern music; or the rebirth of calligraphy; or recent theories of the creation and duration of the universe.” Once again, not everyone is going to have the same tastes but one of the purposes of reading widely is to acquaint yourself with different subject areas. Surely one or another will be more interesting to the individual reader. As a teacher I have always tried to encourage extra credit and individual choice in reading as much as possible.



Highet also believe it was important to read across a whole variety of genres, not merely fiction or merely non-fiction but also travel writing, biography, history, poetry, drams, stories, novels. Highet said “we might read a large selection of poems and prose passages selected in order to illuminate one single aspect of the world. One such volume would go into a pocket or a handbag and yet last all summer.” Ravitch’s American Reader or his English Reader are some good modern examples but there are also the excellent Norton Anthologies. The Library of America has a wonderful series of anthologies, American Sea Writing, Reporting WWII, True Crime: an American Anthology, Baseball: a Literary Anthology and The Lincoln Anthology.


Reading Highet –who wrote this over fifty years ago is sometimes poignant because he often shows to me how he is closer to Victorian Scotland than we are.  Also he also has become from being my contemporary to becoming a historic figure for us living in the 20th century.  Highet wrote most of his best work 50 and 60 years ago.

Highet wrote: “..one might decide to spend the summer with a single great or at least a single interesting man. For example, every doctor should know The Life of Sir William Osler by Harvey Cushing, and after reading that fine book he would enjoy himself if he went on to read Osler’s own writings. Osler never tired of complaining that most doctors had minds too limited and too confined to the physical symptoms which they observed in the routine of their practice. He kept trying to enlarge his own mind and spirit, and his books will therefore enlarge the mind and spirit of his readers, whether they are of the medical profession or not.”



It seems to me Mr. Highet lived in a happier, more sane world in which scholars and teacher could safely assume SOME of their students, neighbor and readers would be broadly educated and have wide interests beyond their own narrow field. Highet assumed there were a well-read general reading public who would seek delight and entertainment as well as enlightenment in the books they read. Highet was sure that if they read and re-read “Great Books” and the best of modern literature he or she would find self-improvement to their liking.

Personally, I cannot imagine a life without books, without literature and without poetry and song. Pop culture and the movies are mildly entertaining but very superficial. The best that can be said for them is that they are an easy shared pleasure.

But even entertaining films like The Rise of the Planet Apes have their literary precursors. La Planète des singes 1963, (Planet of the Apes)of course was first a French novel by Pierre Boulle. Boulle’s book was also influenced by Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, H.G. Well’s The Island of Dr. Moreau.

In this last novel there is an a wise “Ape-Man” - A who considers himself equal to men and capable of “big think.” Even earlier than H.G. Wells is Jules Verne’s Mysterious Island (1874). Also influential was Stephen Vincent Benet’s famous short story “By the Waters of Babylon” (1937) originally called the “Place of the Gods”.



Benet’s work, which was written as a reaction to the Nazi fire-bombing of the Spanish city of Guernica is fascinating because at first one is not certain of the time and place. We find out that the Place of the Gods is actually the bombed out ruins of New York City. It is also fascinating because it was written long before the development of the Atomic bomb or missles yet Benet’s seemed to know that once world war broke out advances in military technology would be ever more dangerous and might even destroy most of humanity. The complete story can be read on the internet. http://www.esm.vt.edu/~sdross/text/babylon1.html

From Richard Connell's famous story; here I saw the movie first. The movie is fairly close to the book except they added a sexy Fay Wray to make it more interesting and to allow for a more chipper dialogue.  Many adventures add a romantic element to add drama and make it more appealing.
There is nothing wrong with reading comic book versions or abridged versions; they can be very entertaining and may lead the reader to read the original later.  I cheerfully admit to having read most of the classics from age 5 to 12 in the Classic Illustrated version.  I read some of them dozens of times.
Flight from the Plaent of the Apes (In German); a book dervied from the movie
The idea of human decline and the fall of civilization due to war, disease or uncontrolled science is a theme seen over and over again. One of the reasons it appeals to people is that we are all fascinated by the very real possibility of the fall of our civilization and the possibility of a “New Dark Age made more sinister and more protracted,” as Churchill himself remarked during WWII. “by the lights of perverted science.” Here there are a plethora of thrilling stories: Well’s The Time Machine (1895) and his The Shape of Things to Come (1933), Nightfall (1941) by Isaac Asimov, or his Foundation Trilogy (1951) “There will come soft rains” (1950) by Ray Bradbury. Then there is I am Legend (1954). Another fine thriller is The White Plague (1982) by Frank Herbert. Film, it seems to me, is very dependent on literature for its best stories and inspiration. In other words even your movie going pleasure is improved by a knowledge of classic film and classic books!

We recall Cicero's speech, Pro Archia, with its famous defense of literature and quoted by Petrarch, Jefferon, Gibbon, Toynbee, Highet and countless others. . Haec studia adolescentiam alunt…"These studies sustain youth and entertain old age, they are an ornament during prosperity. They offer a refuge and solace in hard times; they delight us when we are at home but do not hinder us in the world outside. They are with us in the evenings, in our wanderings and travels and when in the country..."

Petrarch was very fond of this quotation and whenever Cicero used the phrase "litterarum lumen", "the light of literature", Petrarch drew a sketch in the margin  of a candle  (still used as a symbol for enlightenment today).
Sometimes it is good to read serious literature and other times it is good to slum and enjoy more popular genres such as sports, survival literature, adventure or romance. All reading is good in that it sharpens the mind and improves one’s fluency and enriches one’s vocabulary and cultural literacy. Nonetheless, one need not read Moby Dick every day nor write it; one can merely correspond with friends and read as the whim suits.

In conclusion, we may not all be Joseph Conrads or Hemingways or Andrew Roberts or Stephen Ambrose or Edith Wharton but we can write book reviews, blogs and letters.

And this too is part of the Republic of Letters.

And we can read and share our reading experiences with others -for our own edification as well as for others.

Reading is one of the greatest and most lasting pleasures for those wise enough to cultivate this habit.

If you want to be a reader it really is very simple and not that expensive.
Just read. And by all means read for pleasure as much as you can.

Yes, I often tell my students “Try it! You might like it.”

Or as Unamuno said: “leer, leer, leer!” READ, READ, READ.

Wise advice by the most prolific of Spanish authors.



Note: (Cicero Pro Archia

Poeta 7.16).












Saturday, August 6, 2011

Inner excellence matters more than physical appearance

I am presently visiting Phoenix, Arizona where my son and daughter-in-law are residing at present. It is an amazing oasis in the middle of what must have been a burning desert only 100 years ago. I thought Bakersfield, California was hot but Phoenix makes Bakersfield seem tame by comparison as Phoenix is more Texas-like in its 100+ degrees every day (109 day after day). One effect this has is that when one goes for a walk (I have no car) one has to have some water, sun screen (60+ or more) and a hat. It is interesting to visit with so many young people and hear their views and to meet both  athletes and business people. When one comes to a place like this, which is rather far from the centers of culture and far from the sort of people one usually consorts with one is taken aback at times.





Of the young people I met -all college graduates- not a single one reads the daily newspaper or subscribes to a single magazine. What news they get they get from the Daily Show and the Internet but it seems to me they are far more interested in 1) gossip 2) popular culture which includes vampire shows and pop music 3)professional sports and or gambling and 4) sex and pornography (not necessarily in that order). All of the young men in question had his own very attractive "squeeze" (some married some not) but still the talk turned to a discussion on collections of hard core pornography. The kind that makes Playboy seem like Shakespeare! It appeared there was a fascination with hedonism of all kinds particularly the sexual but also food and drink and simple animal pleasures. Everyone was having a Good Time and it seems every lust and appetite was being satisfied and new stimulants for lust were being invented. It appears to me that much of the wealth of America is being squandered before my very eyes on women, drink, drugs, sports, gambling and other modern circuses.




We always talk about education and the future but we must consider the very real possiblity that the American people might just commit suicide. People respect education in a way because they know it is a necessary outward sign of a person of means but that doesn't mean they really like it. Suppose our economic problems were solved and the work week were shortened and vacations of six weeks or more were guaranteed. Which would these people prefer? Art? Music (fine music? Books? or video games, gambling and pornography? I know the new Planet of the Apes film is about to premiere. can't help thinking we MUST be closely related to apes because so few of us understand that hedonistic pleasures are not the same as happiness.




Ingrid Berman in her 20's circa 1943
Irish actress Maureen O'Hara still spry in her 90's
A young actress without any English, French or Italian (she later added these to her native Swedish and German):
INGRID BERGMAN circa 1937 about 19 years old
I thought of the young women I saw last night. As I said they were all very attractive, far above average I would say and all less than 25 years of age; perhaps one or two was 27 or so. Females must be especially burdened by the attention they receive for their pretty faces, curling locks and slender appealing figures. From the time they are young such women must have been flattered by males and evaluated heavily only in terms of their physical appearance.



Unfortunately, if a woman only tends to her looks and physical appearance because she figures that is the way to get a man's attention she may let her inner gifts and talents atrophy. Such a woman puts all of her efforts into enhancing and maintaining her physical beauty at the price of distorting her natural self to pleasure others, chiefly males. Despite all the furor of Equal Rights and Feminism some things have not changed at all especially here in the provinces.



I think it is mistake many people make -and this includes men as well as women. They put all their efforts in managing their physical appearance and the impression they make on others. I could not help but think that some of these young women ten or fifteen years hence will be discarded for "newer models". The lucky ones will have at least gotten married to someone with some money and thus gained some security. Yes, the world may reward us for wrong or superficial reasons -such as our youth and physical beauty- but what really matters now and in the long run is character and culture -who we are inside and who we are becoming.

All of us seek the happy life and a secure life but many confuse the means -wealth and rank- with life. The really worthwhile things are family, children, friends, faith, good books, time spent together with shared leisure -swimming, going to a ball game, telling stories, singing, laughing, cooking family recipes passed down from lip to ear and to tongue, watching fireworks and hiking in the Grand Canyon. The things that make life worthwhile are sound, healthy virtuous activities not the external means that seem to produce it. We are all tempted to buy the fanciest car, the special shoes and the stylish shirt. I saw shirts priced at over $100 each. I saw shoes and accessories priced at over $500 each. But I must say I was very happy with my discounted cotton shirts from JC Penny and my comfortable, well-fitting New Balance (American-made) walking shoes.



But just when I was about to write off an entire generation of Americans I found myself renewed at the ball park.

 There I saw the great mass of Americans lower middle class, middle class and upper middle class, enjoying a common moment of leisure. There I saw many families with young children -2, 3 or even 4 -this isn't Madrid or Rome or Berlin or New York. One of the most touching moments was when they had a romantic frame on the scoreboard for kisses and they moved across the stadium crowd for couples from 18 to 80 and asked them to show us all a kiss. Then they focused in on a pretty young Hispanic woman and a muscular young American with a short crew cut -he might have been an off duty soldier- and he asked her live not for a kiss but on one knee "WILL YOU MARRY ME and MAKE ME THE HAPPIEST MAN IN THE WORLD". The young woman was completely surprised and doubly surprised to be on television and on the big screen of the scoreboard. She literally had to wipe the salt tears from her eyes and gave a big , almost shy smile to the entire crowd and then said yes (THE ENTIRE CROWD CHEERED "YES") and then kissed him. The lucky man then took out an engagement ring and placed it on her finger. My son said to me, "Well, Dad, what do you think of that?" And I sad, "I hope they live happily ever after!"



Some people become very pessimistic that young people are impossible, that illegal immigrants are going to destroy this country, that the Black hate the White and the White hate the Brown etc. But when you go out teach the people as I have, and go to their weddings and baptisms, and see them at their pastimes you have to feel very, very optimistic. Because when it comes down to it the melting pot is still bubbling on.



John F. Kennedy said: "And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future."



My mother used to say that "life and love were just a brief moment in time, so let us forgive each other and let us love one another while we can." When we walk down the street with our son -who is now 26- I remember when we walked out of the Polo Grounds and the old Yankee Stadium three generations of my family. And as the generation of leaves so are the generations of men! It is hard to remember now the loved and the lost but we must remember them with gratitude and tranquility for I was very lucky to have had them as mentors and companions if only for a brief moment in time. Yes, we are all mortal that is a certainty. What lies beyond is not; it may be described as a fond hope.  As Jake Barnes said: "Isn't it pretty to think so."  My father, ever the sceptic said, "I vote yes for all the good it will do me."




I recently re-read MAN'S SEARCH FOR MEANING by Viktor Frankl. I first read it almost 40 years ago and I think I have read it at least once every five years since then. It was not the edition I was used to but a new edition belonging to my son which he had bought at ASU. The older book had a different introduction by a psychologist a certain Dr. Gordon Allport; this edition (2006) had and introduction written by a clergyman, Rabbi Harold S. Kushner. Kushner wrote: "terrible as it was, his experience in Auschwitz reinforced what was already one of his key ideas: Life is not primarily a quest for pleasure, as Freud believed, or a quest for power as Alfred Adler taught, but a quest for meaning. The greatest task for any person is to find meaning in his or her life. Frankl saw three possible sources for meaning: in work (doing something significant), in love (caring for another person), and in courage during difficult times.



I think the reason so many teachers are happy despite everything is that their work is very, very significant. They are not usually rewarded in a material sense but the teacher's true rewards is the love and gratitude of his or her disciples. And I think teachers find joy when they have to be courageous during difficult times.

Think back to Columbine when a teacher sacrificed his life to save his students.



Frankl's love for his young wife -torn from his breast before even a final kiss were possible-is very, very moving: "That brought thoughts of my own wife to mind. And as we stumbled on for miles, slipping on icy spots, supporting each other time and again, dragging one another up and onward, nothing was said, but we both knew: each of us was thinking of us wife. Occasionally I looked in the sky, where the starts were fading and the pink light of the morning was beginning to spread behind a dark bank of clouds. But my mind clung to my wife' image, imagining it with an uncanny acuteness. I heard her answering me, saw her smile, her frank and encouraging look. Real or not, her look was then more luminous than the sun which was beginning to rise.



A thought transfixed me: for the first time in my life I saw the truth as it is set into song by so many poets, proclaimed as the final wisdom by so many thinkers. The truth -that love is the ultimate and the highest goal to which man can aspire. Then I grasped the meaning of the greatest secret that human poetry and human thought and belief have to impart: THE SALVATION OF MAN IS THROUGH LOVE and IN LOVE. I understood how a man who has nothing left in this world may still know bliss, be if only for a brief moment, in the contemplation of his beloved. In a position of utter desolation, when man cannot express himself in positive action, when his only achievement may consist in enduring his sufferings in the right way -an honorable way- in such a position man can, through loving contemplation of the image he carries of his beloved {MUNRO: I would say BELOVEDS}, achieve fulfillment. For the first time in my life I was able to understand the meaning of the words, "The angels are lost in perpetual contemplation of an infinite glory."

***

"My mind still clung to the image of my wife. A thought crossed my mind: I didn't even know if she were still alive. I konw only one thing -which I have learned well by now. LOVE GOES FAR BEYOND THE PHYSICAL PERSON OF THE BELOVED. IT FINDS ITS DEEPEST MEANING IN HIS SPIRITUAL BEING, HIS INNER SELF. Whether or not he is actually present, whether or not he is still alive at all, ceases somehow to be of importantance." ...nothing could touch the strength of my love, my thoughts, and the image of my beloved....."



Yes, Dr. Frankl suffered and was very unlucky. And he would say that suffering is of itself meaningless. We give suffering and sacrifice meaning by the way we respond to it. In our lives there will be forces beyond our ken and beyond our human control. There will be storms, floods, fires and acts of God and acts of the Godless. All our human posseessions could be smashed or taken from us. All those we love might be killed or separated from us forever. But if we live there is one thing , one freedom that no one can take away from us. That is how we respond to the storms, temptations and travails of life. Rabbi Kushner said, following Frankl, "you cannot control what happens to you in life, but you can always, control what you will feel and do about what happens to you."


Argyll and Sutheland Highlanders arrive in France, August 1914:
The many Scottish Pals Aye the Floors o' the Forest are a' weed awa

They suffered over 6,000 killed and 25,000 casualties.  My grandfather lost his brother, his brother-in-law, most of his best friends, over 10 first cousins, all of his commanding officers and NCO's from 1914. All of them. 1914-1918 was a journey of the cross for an entire generation of Scottish manhood; after 1918 over 400,000 Scots (10% of the population and 30% of the youth emigrated most never to return.++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
'
We count our blessings.

I like to put quotations on my bulletin boards. I think I have found a new one for this fall. Teachers all over America must do what men and women will do and must suffer what teachers -especially American teachers must. But no matter what happens or what indignity we suffer we can control how we behave, how we feel and do something about what happens to us and our schools. We are not sticks upon strings adrift without pattern or hope; we are human beings and we are swimmers, strong swimmers. We can endure, we can reach the shore and we can carry on despite everything.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Re: IN GOD WE TRUST vs. E PLURIBUS UNUM

CC: interested parties








Re: IN GOD WE TRUST vs. E PLURIBUS UNUM



http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/mottoletter.asp
















Recently there some controversy on President Obama quoting our "national motto." But which one?


What you have here is the clash of two traditions, zeitgeists or worldviews depending on which word one prefers. Much of the heated nature of contemporary American political debate derives from the clash of fundamental philosophical differences between the adherents of a more traditional Judeo-Christian world view (or Theism) and the more Enlightenment based Secular Humanistic view. The two mottos represent two different intellectual and philosophic movements. One is theistic or God-centered and the other is humanistic or human-centered.


Is there an unwritten constitution (meaning accepted traditions and customs) or is there only positive law as embodied in statues and judicial decisions? Do rights originate with the government or are they inherent or God-given?
It is the same clash of worldviews that says the rights of man are “life, liberty and property” (Locke’s formulation quoted in the U.S. Constitution) and “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (Jefferson’s formulation in the Declaration which is NOT part of the U.S. Constitution but could be said to be a part of America’s unwritten Constitution or tradition of freedom).


It is the same clash of worldviews that alleges that the Mojave Cross or the Pledge of Allegiance ought to be challenged as unconstitutional and in violation of the First Amendment–because they favor “religion”- and tomorrow that only a certain nomenclature is politically acceptable and traditional language as simple as “mankind” (instead of humankind) is worse than obsolete but representative of an invalid and bigoted worldview.


It is the same clash of worldviews that says by definition and tradition marriage is the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife and the liberal relativistic viewpoint that marriage is what we construct or make up according to our legislature or even one judge totally disregarding popular sovereignty AND long established tradition.


There is no question that IN GOD WE TRUST is by law the national motto of the United States. Prior to 1956 it had been on US coins since 1864 and of course is part of our national anthem. It has only been on all US coins since 1955 (adopted by the unanimous vote of Congress). The national anthem was not the national anthem until 1931. It was the US Army anthem; it became popular when it was played before every major league baseball game during the 1917-1918 seasons in honor of the Doughboys. “In God we Trust” ultimately comes from Francis Scott Key’s poem and represents our Judeo-Christian heritage, specifically, I believe, the heritage of the Great Awakening which was a popular religious movement in the 18th century inspired primarily by the open air sermons of English preacher George Whitefield. Whitefield’s emotional rhetoric had a great influence on Patrick Henry who heard him speak as a child in company of his mother who became an adherent to Whitefield’s “New Light” Christianity. Benjamin Franklin, who published Whitefield’s sermons, said during the Constitutional Convention:



"I've lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing Proofs I see of this Truth — That God governs in the Affairs of Men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his Notice, is it probable that an Empire can rise without his Aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred Writings, that except the Lord build the House they labor in vain who build it. I firmly believe this, — and I also believe that without his concurring Aid, we shall succeed in this political Building no better than the Builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our Projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a Reproach and Bye word down to future Ages."



When Franklin spoke like this –alluding to the 127th Psalm- he was appeasing the theistic viewpoint of many of the Founding Fathers, their wives and their supporters that is to say those influenced by the Great Awakening. But Franklin also seems to imply a nation must be united by something such as a common language or culture or common values. “In God We Trust” became our official national motto in 1954 during a Republican administration (Eisenhower) but received almost no opposition from Democrats at the time –indeed most Southern Democrats voted for it. But an argument could be made that “In God We Trust” is an expression of the conservative American theistic worldview, a worldview which is chiefly defended, today, by Republicans. Liberal Democrats today are much more likely to support a secular humanistic view and to be Jeffersonian absolutists when it comes to “separation of Church and State.”



“E pluribus unum” is a Latin phrase that comes ultimately from a translation of a Greek philosophic quotation (probably the pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus). The Latin phrase itself is variously attributed to St. Augustine from his Confessions and to a poem that at one time was attributed to Virgil. This Latin motto represents our classical humanistic Greco-Roman heritage; it is a hallmark of the secular Enlightenment as represented by Thomas Jefferson in particular. Ultimately, we should remember, the Democratic Party has its roots in Jeffersonian Democracy. “E Pluribus Unum” is, however, by tradition, our de facto joint national motto. The reason why it “E Pluribus Unum” never been officially adopted as our national motto may have to do with the suspicion ordinary Americans have of Latin mottos which were seen as aristocratic, elite or even Roman Catholic.

By contrast “In God We Trust” was almost unanimously voted our national motto and in recent polls is supported by over 90% of Americans. This is evidence that the American people believe deeply-still- in the traditions of the Bible (our Judeo-Christian heritage) as one of the pillars of our culture and civilization.


So the rivalry of these two mottos goes back to our founding and is related to the growth of our political parties with their slightly different worldviews. Liberal Humanists favor Lockean religious toleration and they hold that man (to them “humans”) is innately good and so they remain very optimistic that if they spend more money on education or this program or that they can transform a child’s innate tendency or a poor person’s innate tendency towards goodness into genuine virtue. “E pluribus unum” represents this optimism.


Nevertheless most liberal humanists, like Franklin, can peacefully coexist with Theism or “In God We Trust”-but not all. Liberal Humanists may rankle at the suggestion that they have a totalitarian tendency towards religious intolerance or political intolerance but the fact remains Epicurean humanism also has morphed into a New Left or Marxist Humanism which endorses PC speech codes, the elimination of religion from public and private life, an extreme statism and state ownership of property and the means of production for the “benefit” of the “people.” Voltaire said “ quoi que fassiez, écrasez l’ infâme” (“whatever you do crush that infamous thing”: i.e religion ); this is essentially the attitude of Newdow of the anti-Pledge of Allegiance Case. I thought it ironic he wanted to prevent the free choice of his daughter –who was not in his custody at the time- to say the pledge which is what the girl’s mother desired.



But to the New Left nothing matters but power and imposing the “right” or “politically correct” view. These New Left Secular Humanists may not support totalitarian dictatorship per se and insist they are supporters of democracy but they are blind to the fact that the growth of the power of the state may tend towards centralism and authoritarianism. In Glasgow they used to call people like this “Corry-fisted Sullivans”; people who could only see a threat to freedom from the Right and never from the Left. Most reasonable people today would agree that threats to our freedom can come from both quarters. We must never forget that laws mean power of the state over the individual. It is why we have a Bill of Rights in the first place; not to grant us rights but to limit the government (especially the Federal government).




The American political tradition of equality and “live and let live” implies tolerance but few advocate absolute and universal toleration. There can be no toleration of slavery, inhuman child labor, human sacrifice, traffic of human organs, the Gulags or the Nazi Holocaust. Such horrific aberrations are inconsistent with a free peaceful civil society –indeed with world peace- and a free people has a right to reject and fight against such tyrannical totalitarian world views. We, as Americans tolerate sincerely held private beliefs and thoughts but we do not tolerate actions that harm others. We distrust people who desire to deprive another of his or her legitimate freedom and dignity.



Most Americans sense that there is always a conditional right to toleration. We tolerate a wide variety of private behaviors and opinions and thought as long as those opinions do not disrupt education, block public traffic or commerce or harm, kill or terrorize others. John F. Kennedy said, “The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state from the hand of God.” That is, we are “one nation, under God” or “In God We Trust.” This is very profound: for if rights are not natural or God-given to the individual then the State can grant rights or redefine them as it pleases or take them away according to what political group is in power. If we are “one nation, under God” it is implied that our government is limited.



If we are “E pluribus unum” it is implied that our liberty and strength come from our political union of states and of individuals and that we, the people, allow government to be strong. The essence of civic virtue is to believe in the value and importance of the “team”, of unity –the Union- and the necessity for individuals to be able to subordinate their interests, especially in moments of great national crisis, for the good of the survival and success of liberty and of the nation itself.



I remember the Stanley Kramer film INHERIT THE WIND with its magnificent performances by Fredrick March and Spencer Tracy. It was loosely based on the Scopes “Monkey” Trials. I remember at the very end of the trial Spencer Tracy –the Darrow-like character- picks up both the US Constitution and the Bible and carries both of them out of the court room seemingly to say BOTH were pillars of our civilization and both traditions –the Classical Humanist and Theist- could endure side by side. Personally, I think both mottos are very wise and good. Both mottos are posted in every classroom of my high school district and it is good for students and teachers to consider the origins of these ancient sayings. They represent the pluralism of our American political tradition and the peaceful coexistence of different world views which nevertheless embrace a common ground for the common good. I believe as Franklin did that these differences do not necessarily mean that America will be divided into two warring camps pledged to destroy each other. Carl J. Richard has written in THE BATTLE FOR THE AMERICAN MIND “Strongly held beliefs can be compatible with compassion and respect. The battle for the American mind must be fought with ideas, not bullets. “














RICHARD K. MUNRO



January 15, 2011



American Teacher



Kern HS District



Bakersfield, California

Saturday, November 20, 2010

IN CHINA'S ORBIT by Niall Ferguson

Read your piece today. One thing is certain i will put "Civilization the West and the Rest" on my reading list and will pre-order today if possible!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704104104575622531909154228.html


I found your basic thesis very convincing and when you had the Chinese saying "We are Masters now" I could not help but think in the back of your mind the British hearing this from the Americans if not in 1918 then surely in 1945-1946 and definitely by 1956 with the Suez Crisis. My family, which immigrated from Scotland en masse from 1927-1948, witnessed the last great flowering of the British Empire -which they and their kinsmen helped build and defend- and they also witnessed when the "Empire went smash" (a favorite line of my father's and grandfather's taken from the LIVES OF THE BENGAL LANCERS with Gary Cooper and Franchet Tone. My grandfather spent 8 years in the British Merchant Marine and so saw at first hand India, Hong Kong, Singapore, Victoria (BC), Australia, Capetown, Buenos Aires, Cairo, Alexandria, Cyprus, Constantinople (1919), Malta, Gibraltar, London, Glasgow, and Montreal. My kinsmen built the railroads in Argentina (hence the Munro suburb of Buenos Aires built around the Munro train station) and South America. He later spent 5 years in the Army (August 4 1914-May 10 1919 serving with the 3rd Battalion Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders and transferring to the 1st Battalion ASH in Dec 1914 first seeing action at Ypres January-May 1915 and thence on to Gallipoli, Salonika, the Struma Valley and Derian ending the his military service in Constantinople in 1918-1919 as part of the Allied Army of occupation. In the Second World War most of my immediate family served in the American forces (my father, my uncles and first cousins but of course we still had close ties to the Auld Country and so my parents and I knew many people who served in the 51st Highland Division, the British 8th Army and the RAF during WWII as well as some in the Canadian and Commonwealth Forces (Australia and New Zealand). My father was a quasi colonial officer in the Philippines 1944-1946 where he was offered a promotion to Captain and a regular army commission by General Sutherland (chief of staff to General MacArthur whom my father met). My father always said that if he had been in the British Army in 1857 or 1890 he would have accepted such an offer as that would have been the best career choice for a Scot with a "red brick" education (rather than elite public school). But my father, after consultation with my mother, turned that job officer down because he felt that American post 1946 would be booming. And indeed it did right up until the early 1970's. But even then my father was concerned with our ever growing appetite for imported oil. our trade deficit and our slow slipping away from being a creditor nation to a debtor nation. My father was trained as an English and French teacher but who got his MBA at NYU and spent his life as a businessman an financier so he had great insight to America's industrial growth and decline. He financed commercial construction (chiefly diners and restaurants), mining equipment, textile machinery, Caterpillar , John Deer, Case IH tractors, and Allis Chalmers tractors. He was very close the to president of Allis Chalmers in the 1960's and early 70's who like himself was a Glaswegian born Scot. I never met the man himself but my father recounted their many meeting and lunches. They often talked about the rise of Japan and Germany and of the decline of Britain. Often their discussions turned to America's fate as both men saw the same symptoms of decline in the USA due to hubris and the corruption and selfishness of the trade unions which were making American equipment uncompetitive and also gradually losing their reputation for reliability, efficiency and high technology. Although both men were Scots they considered themselves as part of the English-speaking world and in addition they believed only the English-speaking peoples were the only truly free people in the world. Neither man feared Russia whom they considered a backwater but they believed Asia was making a resurgence, particularly in Singapore, Korea (once part of the Japanese Empire), Taiwan (also once part of the Japanese Empire), Japan and Hong Kong. They did not think China could be far behind and sometimes they talked of India as well.



And here I was looking at your projections of growth with China as number 1 and India and the USA battling it out for number 2. These projections seem inevitable and if they come true will see the Pacific Rim come under the Chinese sphere of influence. It is only a matter of time when the 7th fleet will find it self having to make a strategic withdrawal to Hawaii or even San Diego leaving the Pacific Rim at the mercy of the Chinese. The only possible counter (the British being long out of the picture) is a resurgent India as a quasi-English speaking nation. China's great Achilles heel of course is its aging population and its one child policy which has lead to an enormous imbalance of males to females. For that reason one could imagine a scenario in which India-Australia-New Zealand-Canada and the USA have enough economic, military and demographic power to check Chinese hegemony. Whither China? China is one of the great countries and civilizations of the world and it has great scholarly traditions and an ancient mercantile tradition. This is now combined with Western Style education combined with a strong oriental work ethic. The two areas which China is lacking are political freedom and religious freedom. Without an ethical and moral base for their society and without political and personal freedom China may lack essential factors it needs to become a dominant superpower. When one factors India in -and then English-speaking countries of Africa plus Australia especially, Canada and the USA I don't think we can count out the English-speaking peoples. China MAY surpass the USA individually -if everything goes according to plan- or China may enter a period of crisis when it has no clean water, a complete collapse of river and ocean fishing and a collapse in its domestic agriculture. Because Ironically China is like Britain 1900-1945 in that it will be heavily dependent on the importation of food stuffs and raw materials. In addition it may have to import foreign workers and even foreign wives to meet its needs. If China fails to do this -they they may enter a period of slow decline starting in 2030 or 2040 as Japan is experiencing now. My father was fond of saying "money makes the world go round", "money forms the sinews of war" (paraphrase of Cicero), and "Demography is destiny." HIS father, Thomas Munro, Sr. added another quote from an older tradition:” Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh [but] in vain." (Ps 127:1)

Auld Pop (Thomas Munro, Sr.) said we should always look to God's providence with great humility. In all our affairs and business of a family and nation we had to depend upon His blessing. Both my father and Auld Pop believed that the family was the basis of our culture and civilization and If God were not acknowledged there we would have no reason to expect his blessing. Auld Pop often said the "best laid plans o' mice an' men aft gang agley." For enriching a family or nation some are so grasping and avaricious and Midas-like that they forget what really matters which is love and the happiness of one's race and line. Yes, that was an expression I often heard that we should have pride in our race and line (as Munros and as Gaels) and that we should "Dread God" (Biodh T-eagal Dhe Oirre; we should reverence unto God: this is the ancient Munro motto of course). Money was important, of course, because one needed bread "but man did not live on bread alone" and also "what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his soul?" I think it was very clear to me that my father and grandfather were unfailing opponents of the passion for wealth, advancement in society or the preoccupation with material things. Neither man played golf of spent more time than necessary with business associates preferring to spend their holidays and weekend entirely with their wives and children. My father and grandfather taught me to read and write before I went to school and gave me the rudiments of Spanish, Latin, French and Gaelic at home. They considered children to be God's gifts, a heritage, a blessing and special a reward : a thousand treasures in one. They often spoke of "our splendid ancient heritage" which I suppose was our entire civilization of music, poetry, literature, art, language, song and our faith and free institutions. My father and Auld Pop also lived through the Great Depression and had memories of the Highland Clearances and the Great Hunger of the 1840's. They had seen war, experienced hunger, exile and immigration and knew that there was no absolute security to be found in material wealth anywhere at any time. At best money could be a cushion but over and over I was told the "man was the gold and that a man could not be measured by the colour of his skin, or by his speech, or by his clothes and jewels, but only by the heart" (from Mika Waltari) Real wealth was richness of experience, joy in friends and family and delight in conviviality, music, verse, art and literature. So I wonder if Chinese society with its narrow, mean-spirited materialistic vision could ever have any inking of true justice, true freedom and true happiness. This spiritual deficit and this deficit of freedom may prove that China's greatness is house built upon sand. There is a cyclical drama in history and all national rises and falls are merely transient stages along the way though many people lack the broadness of perspective to perceive such a vision. But history remains dynamic subject to many "killer applications" as you say that drives it on and always above all else it seeks balance and equilibrium. The Greeks called this drama Hubris and Nemesis; the Indians called it the law of karma. Pride is not without trouble, Auld Pop would say so let us not be troubled by it. Supremacy, arrogance and domination are not the way of nature and they will be leveled in due course. Every nation has its age of ascendency and its age of decline. My father and Auld Pop spoke as Britons but also as Gaels and Scots who remembered a disastrous history which saw may kingdoms and empires that we served rise and fall. They knew English was the lingua franca of their age but they often said "English is the language of the banks and the long-range guns; which is why everyone speaks English including of course the English. When they cease to have gold and guns then it is vae victis all over again." You might recall vae victis was the Roman translation of one of their earliest humiliations when the Celtic Chief Brennus burnt Rome to the ground. And yes, the proud Celt got his comeuppance. "For when the beat of the kettle-drum of the steely-hard Roman come, taken were our own hill-tops, one by one." Though we face firmly towards the future, we never forget that past. RICHARD KEITH MUNRO

                                                     THOMAS MUNRO, Sr.  Acting Colour Sergeant
                                                      1st Batallion Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders
                                                        Military Medal for Valour, April 15 1915 2nd Ypres.

He served side by side with Captain Dick Porteous (KIA May 10 1915), Colin Campbell Mitchell Sir HLI (later Captain in the Argylls) and American Johnny Robertson. NE OBLIVISCARIS DO NOT FORGET

                                                       "The Thin Red Line of Heroes"